Many were highly critical: for example, Iran called the ban “insulting” and a “gift to extremists,” and German Chancellor Angela Merkel said it was “against the core idea of international aid for refugees and international cooperation.” Canada’s Prime Minister Justin Trudeau took the high road and “defended the importance of welcoming refugees,” saying that “those fleeing persecution, terror and war were welcome in Canada.” International reaction to Trump’s travel ban was swift and varied. Including this one, just in from NPR: “ Airport officials in Cairo say a total of 33 U.S.-bound migrants from Yemen, Syria and Iraq have boarded flights on their way to the United States.” More stories about arrivals from the previously banned countries are surely forthcoming. In another article, 40 Iranians were reported to have arrived in Boston on one flight, as well as at least one Syrian women at Dulles International, who reunited with her son and his wife, both doctors (“ A race,” WP). Among other first arrivals were at least two Iranians: a college student and a research scientist (“ Travelers,” WP). Using Twitter, a reporter wrote that a woman from Iraq was the first to pass through customs. News of arrivals is beginning to trickle in. Begin Arriving at Boston’s Logan Airport. Travelers Previously Blocked from Entering the U.S. And immigrant advocates are “ e ncouraging travelers from the affected countries to get on planes as soon as possible” because of the legal battle isn’t over (“ 9 th Circuit Court,” WP “ State Dept. Meanwhile, the Department of Homeland Security has resumed using the same standard policies and procedures on travelers and refugees that existed prior to Trump’s executive order. While the Trump administration lost the first two rounds, it will surely take its case to the Supreme Court. (An article in USA Today gives a break down of foreign student enrollment country-by-country.) In short, the Ninth District Court affirmed Judge Robart’s ruling, which stated that the travel ban “adversely affects the states’ residents in the areas of employment, education, business, family relations and freedom to travel,” including “the operations and missions of their public universities and other institutions of higher learning.” Indeed, it’s estimated that the travel ban affects over 23,000 students who hold visas to study in the U.S. This rejection means that “travelers from seven predominantly Muslim nations - Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen - as well as vetted refugees from all nations could, for now, continue to enter the country” (“ Appeals Court,” NYT). Ninth District Court of Appeals in San Francisco rejected the Trump administration’s appeal. sponsors).Īs expected, the Justice Department quickly appealed Judge Robart’s decision. – whether valid visa holders (like international students) or well-vetted refugees (like Syrian families with U.S. The Federal District Court in Seattle, led by Judge James Robart, temporarily blocked enforcement of Trump’s travel ban on Friday (Feb 3), one week after Trump signed an executive order that barred people from seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the U.S. TRUMP’S TRAVEL BAN REMAINS BLOCKED – FOR NOW I keep thinking of the ( apocryphal ) Chinese curse: “May you live in interesting times.” But there are feel-good moments – and I end with an especially heart-warming one. So I’ve decided to focus on news that affects our relations with people in other countries, Trump’s travel ban in particular, which continues to outrage. And I thought Trump’s first week as president was tumultuous! This one, his second, is just as raucous, if not more so.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |